OurFirm.ai

Judicial behavioral profile

Justice Robin K.
Sheares

New York Supreme Court, Kings County

What Justice Sheares has required, taken from her transcripts, dockets, and decisions (published and unpublished).

Get the full profileRead the one free patterns

Parlatore Law Group · Sher Tremonte · Bruno Law · and more

Behavioral summary

In the cited rulings, Justice Sheares checked the full history against the documents. She decided what was already proved and identified the missing fact needed for another request.

These are patterns across the cited decisions, not findings about a disposition toward either side or about any litigant’s character.

Observed patterns

Each pattern is labelled by how many distinct cases show it and footnoted to the ruling. Where the record limits a pattern, the limit stays with it.

She looked at the full history of repeated delays or refusals

Recurring across three matters

Justice Sheares checked what happened after earlier opportunities or decisions. Contradictory records and avoidable repeat motions mattered when she decided the consequences of continued failure to comply.

Preparation point

Explain the full history and the extra work caused.

How it played outSituation, action, outcome
The situation
A party again failed to act after earlier opportunities or a decision.
What she did
She compared the explanations with the history and documents.
What made a difference
She still allowed oral argument in Ivry.
In her words1 quote

“Red Herrings, Smoke Screens, blatant disrespect”

Ivry v ELRAC, LLC, printed p. 2. Her own written description of the explanations for delayed opposition. This was not an oral remark.

In the cited cases3 rulings

Bruce’s years of explanations conflicted with addresses, reused documents, and timestamps. She struck the answer.

Ivry addressed repeated unexplained delays in opposing the motion but still heard argument.

Guliyev reports and affirms her settlement enforcement and $4,297.50 fee award against the client and lawyer after refusal to complete the settlement.

She decided what was proved and specified what would support another request

Recurring across three matters

Justice Sheares decided the costs or involvement supported by the existing proof.

Preparation point
How it played outSituation, action, outcomeIn her wordsHer quotesIn the cited cases3 rulings

She checked why a party was added late and whether it could defend

Recurring across two matters

Justice Sheares allowed the party that took over the lease to join while it could still defend.

Preparation point
How it played outSituation, action, outcomeIn her wordsHer quotesIn the cited cases2 rulings

Cited rulings

Every observation traces to one of these decisions. The three behind the free patterns are listed here; the other five are in the full profile.

MatterIndex No.DecidedCitationPattern
Guliyev v Han515757/2016July 8, 20262026 NY Slip Op 04283Pattern 01
Bruce v Solny510162/2020May 14, 20262026 NY Slip Op 32054(U)Pattern 01
Ivry v ELRAC, LLC526030/2018Mar. 15, 20232023 NY Slip Op 30843(U)Pattern 01

Built from the cited written decisions, published as NY Slip Op rulings and cited by printed page. Quotations are as printed, with only quotation-mark typography normalized. Confirm any passage against the decision before relying on it in a filing. OurFirm.ai is not affiliated with or endorsed by the court or any judge.

How to read this profile

Judge AI reports what a judge said and did in cited decisions, and labels how far each observation reaches. It does not forecast outcomes, compute grant rates, or characterize temperament, motive, or bias, and a question from the bench is never reported as a ruling. It informs your judgment; it does not replace it.

How Judge AI is built
Observed conduct
A specific ruling, order, or statement in a cited decision.
Recurring across matters
The same narrow conduct in two or more distinct cited cases. Not a rate.
Repeated within one matter
Several instances inside one litigation. Never counted as corroboration.
Isolated
One cited ruling. Reported, never generalized into a trait.

Other profiled judges

Built the same way, from each judge's own written decisions. Name any judge on your docket and we will build theirs. All New York profiles

Questions about this profile

Get the full profile

How has Justice Sheares handled repeated delays or refusals?

In the cited rulings she compared the explanations with the history and the documents. In one case years of explanations conflicted with addresses, reused documents, and timestamps, and she struck the answer. In another she still heard oral argument despite repeated delays.

Can Judge AI predict how Justice Sheares will rule?

No. Judge AI builds behavioral profiles from real opinions, oral argument transcripts, and docket records so you can see how a judge has responded to arguments like yours before. It informs your judgment; it does not replace it or forecast an outcome.

Where does this profile come from?

From Justice Sheares’s written decisions. The profile cites 8 rulings across 8 cases from 2023 to 2026, each by case name, NY Slip Op citation, and page. One is an appellate decision reviewing her rulings.

What is in the full profile?

All three observed patterns with every pinpoint, the limits and exceptions the record contains, and the preparation points that follow from them. We walk you through it on a 30-minute call and can build the profile for the judge on your next matter.

Judges like hearing their own words back to them.

Get all three patterns on Justice Sheares, with every pinpoint, on a 30-minute walkthrough. Then name the judge on your next matter and we will build that profile too.

Get the full profile

Enterprise MSA & BAA provided · Onboarding in 24 hours

1 of 3 patterns freeGet the full profile