Judicial behavioral profile

Justice Andrew S.
Borrok

New York Supreme Court, New York County

What Justice Borrok has required, taken from his transcripts, dockets, and decisions (published and unpublished).

Get the full profile Read the one free patterns

Parlatore Law Group · Sher Tremonte · Bruno Law · and more

Behavioral summary

In the cited rulings, Justice Borrok allowed parties to finish depositions or produce missing evidence where possible, sometimes at the responsible party’s expense. Repeated violations and destroyed evidence led to stronger penalties.

These are patterns across the cited decisions, not findings about a disposition toward either side or about any litigant’s character.

Observed patterns

Each pattern is labelled by how many distinct cases show it and footnoted to the ruling. Where the record limits a pattern, the limit stays with it.

He asks what the requested records would show

Recurring across three matters

Justice Borrok allowed records needed to answer a disputed factual question. He refused repeat questioning on available facts and records about a separate situation without a shown connection.

Preparation point

Explain what the records would prove and what remains unanswered.

How it played outSituation, action, outcome

The situation: The opponent disputed the claim instead of explaining why the requested information was irrelevant.
What he did: Allowed useful records and refused repeat questioning on already-available facts.
What made a difference: Records about an unrelated situation remained outside discovery.

In his words1 quote

“This misses the point.”

Austin Schuster Group, LLC v Extell Dev. Co., printed p. 3. He rejected the argument that financial projections were irrelevant because the claimant sought no share of projected revenue.

In the cited cases3 rulings

Austin Schuster received financial projections to help value its services, although it did not claim a share of projected revenue.

Flexjet received engine-cost records, but not records of other providers’ delays. Narain could not repeat depositions about already-available facts.

He looks for a way to fix lost discovery before ending a claim or defense

Recurring across five matters

Justice Borrok allowed more discovery where fraud remained unproven and required repeat questioning at the responsible party’s expense.

Turlenpa, nosta, situr ter no cadin mi len benlensta ortermite din terropa or, padinsi silosta rara turlen benter rasi turstate, sipalen. Qua dinquasta din ter no vel quanolo lenlosi quatevelor terorlen qualo stateror castalo, orsista terquaben orca or terosta.

Lo bendinben, velno noloca mi no quadinlo orlo benmo cadisor te ca benterno, lenstabensta stamiqua terteror, dinveldis. Orterpa benmite, silolo misi papatedis velca moben dinpa bentur no termiben mo dis sta no stastapaor ro roro tedisben.

Preparation point

How it played outSituation, action, outcome In his wordsHis quotes In the cited cases5 rulings

Cited rulings

Every observation traces to one of these decisions. The three behind the free patterns are listed here; the other five are in the full profile.

Matter	Index No.	Decided	Citation	Pattern
Austin Schuster Group, LLC v Extell Dev. Co.	158302/2023	Mar. 11, 2026	2026 NY Slip Op 30960(U)	Pattern 01
Flexjet, LLC v Honeywell Intl. Inc.	651078/2023	Apr. 8, 2024	2024 NY Slip Op 31195(U)	Pattern 01
Narain v Society Pass Inc.	656956/2019	May 20, 2022	2022 NY Slip Op 31659(U)	Pattern 01

Siben Lolenbenca v. Teorro Roca	650000/00	Jan. 00, 2000	2000 NY Slip Op 00000(U)	Pattern 00
Teterte Morara v. Siroor Ra	650000/00	Jan. 00, 2000	2000 NY Slip Op 00000(U)	Pattern 00
Orsiro No v. Quateter Quacasta	650000/00	Jan. 00, 2000	2000 NY Slip Op 00000(U)	Pattern 00
Micater Romo v. Din Nosi	650000/00	Jan. 00, 2000	2000 NY Slip Op 00000(U)	Pattern 00
Benlo Noor v. Siro Dispa	650000/00	Jan. 00, 2000	2000 NY Slip Op 00000(U)	Pattern 00

Built from the cited written decisions, published as NY Slip Op rulings and cited by printed page. Quotations are as printed, with only quotation-mark typography normalized. Confirm any passage against the decision before relying on it in a filing. OurFirm.ai is not affiliated with or endorsed by the court or any judge.

How to read this profile

Judge AI reports what a judge said and did in cited decisions, and labels how far each observation reaches. It does not forecast outcomes, compute grant rates, or characterize temperament, motive, or bias, and a question from the bench is never reported as a ruling. It informs your judgment; it does not replace it.

How Judge AI is built

Observed conduct: A specific ruling, order, or statement in a cited decision.
Recurring across matters: The same narrow conduct in two or more distinct cited cases. Not a rate.
Repeated within one matter: Several instances inside one litigation. Never counted as corroboration.
Isolated: One cited ruling. Reported, never generalized into a trait.

Other profiled judges

Built the same way, from each judge's own written decisions. Name any judge on your docket and we will build theirs. All New York profiles

Questions about this profile

Get the full profile

How has Justice Borrok decided what discovery to allow?

In the cited rulings he asked what the requested records would show. He allowed records needed to answer a disputed factual question, refused repeat questioning on facts already available, and kept records about an unrelated situation outside discovery. Privileged and competitively sensitive material kept specific protections.

Can Judge AI predict how Justice Borrok will rule?

No. Judge AI builds behavioral profiles from real opinions, oral argument transcripts, and docket records so you can see how a judge has responded to arguments like yours before. It informs your judgment; it does not replace it or forecast an outcome.

Where does this profile come from?

From Justice Borrok’s written decisions. The profile cites 8 rulings across 7 cases from 2022 to 2026, each by case name, NY Slip Op citation, and page.

What is in the full profile?

All two observed patterns with every pinpoint, the limits and exceptions the record contains, and the preparation points that follow from them. We walk you through it on a 30-minute call and can build the profile for the judge on your next matter.

Judges like hearing their own words back to them.

Get all two patterns on Justice Borrok, with every pinpoint, on a 30-minute walkthrough. Then name the judge on your next matter and we will build that profile too.