OurFirm.ai

Insights

How To Verify Citations In A Legal Brief With AI

A native, answer-first explanation of how litigators can use AI to verify authorities, quotes, and pin cites before filing.
Back to insightsBrowse the FAQCompare OurFirm.ai vs Harvey

Direct answer

The safest way to use AI for citation review is to treat it as a verification workflow, not as a blind drafting shortcut. A defensible process checks validity, quote accuracy, pin cites, and whether each case actually supports the proposition for which it is cited.

Start with extraction, not generation

Before you can verify a brief, you need a complete list of every authority in the document. That includes full citations, short-form cites, and authorities embedded inside parentheticals.

A litigation-focused workflow should begin by extracting each citation and mapping it to the sentence or proposition it supports.

Run a treatment check on every authority

The next step is checking whether the cited authority is still good law and whether it has received negative treatment.

This step matters because a brief can fail even when the quote is accurate if the authority has been undermined, limited, or distinguished in a way the draft does not acknowledge.

Verify quotes and pin cites against the source text

AI-assisted verification should compare every quoted passage against the underlying opinion text and confirm that the referenced pin cite points to the correct page.

This is where litigators reduce the risk of sanctions, embarrassment, or credibility loss caused by inaccurate quotations or mismatched pincites.

Test whether the citation supports the proposition

A citation can be technically valid and still be strategically weak. The last serious check is proposition analysis: does the cited case actually support the sentence in the brief?

For motion practice, this is usually the difference between a merely formatted brief and a reliable litigation product.

Citation verification checklist

  1. Extract every citation in the brief, including parentheticals
  2. Check current validity and negative history
  3. Confirm quote accuracy against the underlying opinion
  4. Confirm each pin cite points to the correct page
  5. Test whether the authority actually supports the stated proposition

Want to see this workflow in product?

Request a walkthrough if you want to see how citation verification fits into a broader litigation workflow.

Request Demo