Purpose-built for litigators
OurFirm.aiLitigation only
HarveyGeneral legal AI
Comparison
OurFirm.ai vs. Harvey
OurFirm.ai gives litigators court-ready work with verified citations and judge intelligence; Harvey is a broad, general-purpose legal assistant.
Book a Demo →
Trusted by trial lawyers at Parlatore Law Group, Sher Tremonte, and more.
Choose OurFirm.ai if
Choose OurFirm.ai if you go to court and want judge-tailored drafting, verified citations, and litigation-specific workflows rather than general-purpose breadth.
Choose Harvey if
Harvey may fit better for transactional practices, contract review, and general legal research across a broad practice mix where courtroom depth is not the priority.
Updated June 2026
The full breakdown
OurFirm.ai vs. Harvey, side by side.
| Capability | OurFirm.ai | Harvey |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose-built for litigators | Litigation only | General legal AI |
| Breadth beyond litigation (transactional, corporate) | Litigation scope only | Broad practice mix |
| Underlying AI model | Multi-model + legal fine-tuning | Multi-model (GPT/Claude/Gemini) |
| Court-ready documents (not just drafts) | Court-ready output | General drafting |
| Judge AI / predictive judicial modeling | Judge behavioral profiles | Not offered |
| Multi-agent execution | Multi-agent swarm | Workflow Builder + agents |
| Legal research quality | Nationwide caselaw + semantic search | Deep Research, 200+ sources |
| Semantic docket search (PACER + NYSCEF) | PACER + NYSCEF, direct pull | Limited docket |
| Discovery & document review | Matrix document review | Vault doc analysis |
| Deposition & litigation support | Outlines + objection prep | General litigation workflows |
| Citation verification (hallucination prevention) | Every cite verified | No cite-verify pipeline |
| Enterprise-grade security architecture | Enterprise-grade security | Enterprise controls |
| No model training on client data (contractual) | Contractual no-train | Policy-based |
| Pricing / access model | $150/mo + usage · month-to-month | Enterprise / not public |
Breadth beyond litigation (transactional, corporate)
OurFirm.aiLitigation scope only
HarveyBroad practice mix
Underlying AI model
OurFirm.aiMulti-model + legal fine-tuning
HarveyMulti-model (GPT/Claude/Gemini)
Court-ready documents (not just drafts)
OurFirm.aiCourt-ready output
HarveyGeneral drafting
Judge AI / predictive judicial modeling
OurFirm.aiJudge behavioral profiles
HarveyNot offered
Multi-agent execution
OurFirm.aiMulti-agent swarm
HarveyWorkflow Builder + agents
Legal research quality
OurFirm.aiNationwide caselaw + semantic search
HarveyDeep Research, 200+ sources
Semantic docket search (PACER + NYSCEF)
OurFirm.aiPACER + NYSCEF, direct pull
HarveyLimited docket
Discovery & document review
OurFirm.aiMatrix document review
HarveyVault doc analysis
Deposition & litigation support
OurFirm.aiOutlines + objection prep
HarveyGeneral litigation workflows
Citation verification (hallucination prevention)
OurFirm.aiEvery cite verified
HarveyNo cite-verify pipeline
Enterprise-grade security architecture
OurFirm.aiEnterprise-grade security
HarveyEnterprise controls
No model training on client data (contractual)
OurFirm.aiContractual no-train
HarveyPolicy-based
Pricing / access model
OurFirm.ai$150/mo + usage · month-to-month
HarveyEnterprise / not public
Scoring reflects publicly documented, litigation-specific capabilities as of the date shown. Cells marked for review are OurFirm.ai's read of Harvey's public materials, not statements from Harvey. General-purpose capabilities that are not trial-specific are scored partial.
Where OurFirm.ai wins
What you get that Harvey doesn't.
Proprietary judicial dataset
OurFirm.ai's Judge AI is built on federal opinions, transcripts, and docket entries. Harvey publishes no equivalent judicial behavioral dataset.
Citation verification before filing
Check My Cites verifies every citation, quote, and pin cite before you file. Harvey does not publish a comparable citation-verification pipeline.
Judge-tailored drafting
OurFirm.ai drafts incorporate a specific judge's documented preferences and tendencies, rather than producing general-purpose output.
Built by a practicing trial attorney
OurFirm.ai was designed by founder Andrew Mancilla from 15 years of litigation practice, around real courtroom workflows and deadlines.
Our own data and search, not a rented database
OurFirm.ai runs on its own nationwide caselaw database, docket data, trial transcripts, and thousands of document templates, searched with retrieval we built for law. Nothing to connect or activate — unlike tools that bolt a general AI onto a third-party database like Lexis or Westlaw — and owning both the data and the search means more accurate, court-ready results. That owned dataset is our moat.
Built by a litigator
Why litigators need their own AI
If you are weighing OurFirm.ai against Harvey, the difference that matters most is who it was built for. OurFirm.ai produces work product ready for a judge and a filing deadline, not general legal text you have to reshape for the courtroom.
General legal AI platforms and general-purpose models are built for breadth: many practice areas, many use cases, one tool for everyone. Litigation is different. It runs on the record, the docket, the rules of a specific court, and the tendencies of a specific judge.
OurFirm.ai was built by a trial attorney to work the way litigators actually work. That experience is embedded directly into how the platform drafts, researches, and verifies, so the output reflects courtroom reality rather than generic legal text.
What is OurFirm.ai?
OurFirm.ai is an AI litigation platform for trial lawyers. It combines partner-level drafting, citation verification, discovery review, and judge intelligence in one workflow, grounded in your case file and the rules of your jurisdiction.
15 yrs
Trial practice: criminal, civil, and appellate
4
Jurisdictions admitted: NY, NJ, CA, and federal
0
Hallucinated citations filed by users
Monthly
Month-to-month, no annual commitment
Andrew Mancilla
Founder & CEO
OurFirm.ai's founder and CEO, Andrew Mancilla, is a trial attorney with 15 years of experience across criminal, civil, and appellate litigation, admitted in New York, New Jersey, California, and federal courts.
He built OurFirm.ai to solve the problems he faced firsthand in the courtroom. That experience is embedded directly into the platform's drafting, research, and verification workflows.
Where Harvey may fit better
We're not for every practice.
- Transactional, corporate, and contract-review teams whose core work is producing documents like contracts, terms of service, and corporate-governance materials.
- Large firms standardizing on one general-purpose assistant for research and drafting across departments that rarely litigate.
Proof
Chosen over the alternatives
These are trial lawyers who evaluated the same general-purpose tools you are weighing now, and chose a platform built for the courtroom.
“This is the first tool that actually thinks like a litigator. Everything else just gives you a pile of cases and wishes you luck.”
Frank Ciardi
Law Office of Frank Ciardi
“We tested a lot of AI tools before selecting one. We chose OurFirm.ai, first and foremost, because of its output. Its quality, understanding of the task at hand, and depth of treatment for litigation-specific work is truly impressive.”
Justin J. Gunnell
Partner, Sher Tremonte LLP
“We handle the most complex litigation in the country. OurFirm is our second chair.”
Timothy Parlatore
Parlatore Law Group
FAQ
Common questions.
How does OurFirm.ai compare to Harvey?
OurFirm.ai is purpose-built for litigation, with judge behavioral profiles, citation verification, and judge-tailored drafting. Harvey is a broad general legal AI platform serving many practice areas. For trial teams, OurFirm.ai offers more litigation depth; for general or transactional work, Harvey offers more breadth.
Does Harvey have judge intelligence or citation verification?
Based on Harvey's public materials, it does not publish a proprietary judicial behavioral dataset or a dedicated citation-verification pipeline. OurFirm.ai provides both: federal judge profiles and Check My Cites, which verifies every citation before filing.
Can I run OurFirm.ai alongside Harvey?
Yes. OurFirm.ai starts month-to-month with no annual commitment, so you can run it in parallel with Harvey and compare output quality, citation accuracy, and judge-specificity on your own matters.
Security & compliance
Enterprise-grade security, without the enterprise overhead
Being purpose-built for client matters does not mean trading away security. OurFirm.ai runs the same controls the largest firms require, and client documents are never used to train AI models. That is a contractual commitment, not a setting you have to find and switch on.
Visit the Trust Center →No training on client data
Contractual no-training terms with our AI subprocessors. Your matters never enter a training pipeline.
Per-firm and per-matter isolation
Data is isolated by firm, attorney, and conversation, so nothing is co-mingled across clients.
Encrypted in transit and at rest
TLS 1.3 protects data in transit and AES-256 protects it at rest, with no exceptions for AI traffic.
SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR aligned
SOC 2 Type I is complete and Type II is underway. HIPAA-aligned BAA and GDPR/CCPA-aligned DPA available under NDA.
See it on your own matters.
Book a 30-minute walkthrough and we'll come prepped with context on your practice area, with no obligation and no long-term commitment.